The Mag 7 as a reserve asset/Powell, the day after & other central bank news/What WSM & FIVE are doing to mitigate tariff impact

I've argued over the past few months that the Mag 7 stocks became a reserve currency holding for foreign holders, including some central banks like the Norges Bank and the Swiss National Bank. My friend Torsten Slok posted this chart yesterday highlighting the extent to which foreigner's own US stocks. I reiterate my belief expressed last month that the dominance of the AI tech/Mag 7 trade is over and also has possibly repercussions for the US dollar as foreign money finds opportunities elsewhere. Also, if the administration is successful in reducing the US trade deficit (whether a laudable goal or not), foreigners will have less money to reinvest in the US as they accumulate less dollars.

To use one example, as of 12/31 13F filings, the Norges Bank (Norway's central bank) owned 105mm shares of Microsoft, 187mm shares of Apple, 324mm shares of Nvidia, 124mm shares of Amazon, 129mm shares of Alphabet, 34mm shares of Meta and almost 36mm shares of Tesla. The first six stocks mentioned here are their top six holdings. Tesla is 11.

With respect to Powell's presser, it's obvious they are in wait and see mode and he believes that they are not in a hurry to cut rates again, notwithstanding the dot plot refresh sticking to 2 cuts this year (though rounding it is slightly less than December plot). That said, the easing bias is clearly still there as he thinks they are still with restrictive policy and he used the T word again, transitory. On the slashing of Treasury QT to just $5b per month from $25b previously which was already cut, he was not very clear with his answers to questions on it. Initially it was thought to be in response to the debt ceiling and possible issues with it that once resolved, QT would increase again but yesterday he said it was more related to some tightness in money markets which he didn't specify nor elaborate on and thus will be kept at this new pace.

Alexandra Harris at Bloomberg wrote a piece after the meeting yesterday titled "There are Inconsistencies in Fed's Balance-Sheet Communication." While Powell cited money market issues, she said "While there has been some upward pressure on repo rates around Treasury auction settlement days, and month and quarter end periods, funding markets have been relatively tame. Even the New York Fed's newest indicator, Reserve Demand Elasticity, or RDE - a real time assessment of the abundance of US bank reserves - is little changed." She also quotes Roberto Perli, "who oversees the central bank's portfolio of securities" and who said "in remarks on March 5 that 'signals from the repo market suggest no cause of concern.' "

Something unusual here on the QT cut I believe. Chris Waller, why did you dissent? Scott Bessent, is this your way of getting help from Jay Powell in keeping long rates tame?

Either way on QT, he made it a point to say there should be no signals taken from this as they will just stretch out the time period of QT to get to the same place but that's not how markets react as Treasuries rallied and are again today.